The U.S. Securities and Trade Fee has cleared the way for Apple shareholders to vote on a proposal demanding its board to evaluation its use of non-disclosure agreements and other concealment clauses.

In the proposal, activist investor Nia Effects Cash mentioned Apple’s concealment clauses do not exclude “[its] workers’ legal rights to discuss overtly about harassment, discrimination, and other unlawful acts.” It proposed that the company’s board prepare a public report examining the probable dangers to Apple of acquiring concealment clauses without having such exclusion clauses.

Apple questioned the SEC for a “no-action” letter stating it would not suggest enforcement motion if the corporation did not put the proposal before shareholders at its up coming annual standard conference in 2022.

But according to Reuters, the commission has denied Apple’s request, getting that it had not currently “substantially implemented” the underlying fears and important goals of the proposal.

“The SEC’s response to Apple could bode badly for other providers,” Ars Technica mentioned, noting that the regulator previous month transformed its insurance policies to make it harder for providers to get no-motion letters less than Trade Rule 14a-8, which needs providers to include shareholder proposals in proxy statements.

Apple informed the SEC in October that it had achieved the “substantial implementation” test, in component because there is no provision in its typical separation arrangement that “would prohibit previous workforce from talking about harassment, discrimination, or other unlawful acts in the office with anybody.”

Nonetheless, previous Apple software program engineer Cher Scarlett filed a whistleblower complaint with the SEC a week afterwards alleging the corporation had built “false statements or deceptive statements” in its response to Nia’s proposal.

She attached a duplicate of the settlement arrangement Apple provided her that incorporated a “statement [that] I was permitted to say about my leaving the corporation being a personal determination, alternatively than fleeing a hostile operate ecosystem immediately after attempting to physical exercise my legal rights and aid many others organize” less than federal labor rules.

Nia Effects Cash has informed the SEC it has “received info, confidentially furnished, that Apple has sought to use concealment clauses in the context of discrimination, harassment, and other office labor violation claims.”

activist investorApple, Nia Effects Cash, non-disclosure arrangement, Proxy assertion, U.S. Securities and Trade Fee