No EntryPoverty ReductionNov 2021
The procedures to pick safety web beneficiaries are the matter of recurrent debates. Targeting assessments normally aim on effectiveness by documenting the pre-plan profile of chosen beneficiaries. This analyze offers a more extensive assessment of targeting efficiency by an experiment embedded in a nationwide funds transfer plan in Niger. Eligible villages were being randomly assigned to have beneficiary households chosen by neighborhood-based targeting (CBT), proxy-usually means screening (PMT), or a components to detect the food stuff-insecure (FCS). The analyze considers targeting legitimacy and the impression of targeting alternative on plan usefulness based on information gathered soon after plan roll-out. PMT is more effective in pinpointing households with lower intake for every capita. Nonbeneficiaries find components-based procedures (PMT and FCS) more respectable than CBT. Manipulation and information imperfections have an effect on CBT, which can reveal why it is not the most respectable. Plan impacts on some welfare dimensions are larger sized among households chosen by PMT than CBT.
- 2012. “Targeting the Lousy: Evidence from a Subject Experiment in Indonesia.” American Economic Overview 102 (4): 1206–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2019. “Does Elite Capture Make a difference? Area Elites and Specific Welfare Programs in Indonesia.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 109: 334–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2016a. “Network Structure and the Aggregation of Facts: Principle and Evidence from Indonesia.” American Economic Overview 106 (seven): 1663–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2016b. “Self-Targeting: Evidence from a Subject Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Financial system 124 (two): 371–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2018. “Locating the Lousy vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Discovering the Motorists of Targeting Performance in Indonesia.” Entire world Lender Economic Overview 33 (three): 573–97. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 2019. “Common Standard Cash flow in the Establishing Entire world.” Once-a-year Overview of Economics 11 (1): 959–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2000. “Capture and Governance at Area and National Levels.” American Economic Overview ninety (two): 135–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2019. “Decentralization and Efficiency of Subsidy Targeting: Evidence from Chiefs in Rural Malawi.” Journal of Community Economics 185: 1–25. Google Scholar.
- 2020. “Foodstuff Protection Actions in Sub-Saharan Africa. A Validation of the LSMS-ISA Scale.” Journal of African Economies 29 (1): 90–120. Google Scholar.
- 2019. “Promoting Productive Inclusion and Resilience among the Lousy: Multi-place RCT of the Sahel Adaptive Social Defense Plan.” AEA RCT Registry. Google Scholar.
- 2018. “A Lousy Implies Exam? Econometric Targeting in Africa.” Journal of Improvement Economics 134: 109–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2014. “Validity and Reliability of Foodstuff Protection Actions.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1331 (1): 230–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2004a. Targeting of Transfers in Establishing Nations around the world: Overview of Classes and Expertise. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Entire world Lender Publications. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 2004b. “Targeting Results Redux.” Entire world Lender Exploration Observer 19 (1): 61–85. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 2004. “On the Targeting and Redistributive Efficiencies of Substitute Transfer Instruments.” Overview of Cash flow and Wealth 50 (1): 11–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2002. “Community-Based mostly Targeting Mechanisms for Social Protection Nets: A Significant Overview.” Entire world Improvement thirty (three): 375–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2015. Protection Nets in Africa: Effective Mechanisms to Arrive at the Lousy and Most Vulnerable. Washington, DC: Entire world Lender and Agence Française de Développement. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 2017. “The Targeting Performance of Social Transfers.” Journal of Improvement Performance 9 (two): 162–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2020. Discovering Common Standard Cash flow: A Manual to Navigating Principles, Evidence, and Practices. Washington, DC: Entire world Lender. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 1995. “Proxy Implies Tests for Targeting Social Programs.” Functioning Paper 118, Residing Requirements Measurement Review, Entire world Lender. Washington, DC, United states. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 2018. “Common Standard Incomes versus Specific Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Establishing Nations around the world.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (4): 201–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2019. “Targeting Ultra-bad Households in Honduras and Peru.” Entire world Lender Economic Overview 33 (1): 63–94. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 2016. “How Narrowly Must Anti-poverty Programs Be Specific? Simulation Evidence from Bolivia and Indonesia.” Dialogue Paper Sequence No. 213, Göttingen University. Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar.
- 2016. “Retooling Poverty Targeting Making use of Out-of-Sample Validation and Machine Discovering.” Entire world Lender Economic Overview 32 (three): 531–50. Google Scholar.
- 2013. “Community-Based mostly Targeting in the Social Defense Sector.” Functioning Paper No. 514, Overseas Improvement Institute, London, British isles. Google Scholar
- 2012. “Beyond Baseline and Observe-Up: The Case for More T in Experiments.” Journal of Improvement Economics ninety nine (two): 210–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 2012. “Who is Vouching for the Input Voucher? Decentralized Targeting and Elite Capture in Tanzania.” Entire world Improvement 40 (eight): 1619–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2020. “Behavioral Adjust Promotion, Money Transfers and Early Childhood Improvement, Experimental Evidence from a Federal government Plan in a Lower-income Location.” Entire world Lender Coverage Exploration Functioning Paper No. 9368, Entire world Lender: Washington, DC, United states. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 1995. “Is Targeting By a Function Need Effective? Some Evidence for Rural India.” In Community Investing and the Lousy: Principle and Evidence. Edited by Dominique van de Walle and Kimberly Nead, 413–44. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Push. Google Scholar.
- 2009. “How Pertinent is Targeting to the Good results of an Antipoverty Plan?” Entire world Lender Exploration Observer 24 (two): 205–31. LinkGoogle Scholar.
- 2019. “How to Focus on Households in Adaptive Social Defense Methods? Evidence from Humanitarian and Improvement Methods in Niger.” Journal of Improvement Research 55 (sup1): 75–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2016. “Reaching the Lousy: Money Transfer Plan Targeting in Cameroon.” Entire world Improvement 83: 244–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar.
- 2020. “Lousy Households’ Productive Investments of Money Transfers: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Niger.” Journal of African Economies 29 (1): 63–89. Google Scholar.
- 2009. “Validating the Entire world Foodstuff Programme’s Foodstuff Usage Score and Substitute Indicators of Home Foodstuff Protection.” Dialogue Paper 00870, Intercontinental Foodstuff Coverage Exploration Institute, Washington, DC, United states. Google Scholar.
Entire world Lender. 2011. “Niger Protection Internet Job, Job Appraisal Document.” Entire world Lender, Washington, DC, United states. Google Scholar Entire world Lender. 2017. “Republic of Niger. Priorities for Ending Poverty and Boosting Shared Prosperity. Systematic Nation Diagnostic.” Entire world Lender, Washington, DC, United states. LinkGoogle Scholar Entire world Foodstuff Programme. 2008. “Food Usage Evaluation: Calculation and Use of the Foodstuff Usage Score in Foodstuff Usage and Foodstuff Protection Evaluation.” Technological Advice Sheet, Rome. Google Scholar
- 1998. “Nonparametric Regression Approaches in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (two): 669–721. Google Scholar.