The Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) in its additional affidavit to the National Firm of Legislation Tribunal (NCLT) has reiterated its stance on the problem of slots stating the resolution applicant are not able to claim historicity on slots that have been allocated to them previously.
“….there simply cannot be any automatic revival of approvals granted to Jet airways and reinstatement of slots, which have been with Jet airways and the same would be as for each the extant guidelines and regulations”, claimed MoCA and Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) claimed in its affidavit.
When Jet Airways shut functions, the slots which have been allocated to it have been quickly distributed between a variety of airlines. And, the airlines that have been referred to as upon to right away generate infrastructure so that the general public at large does not confront any hardship have invested huge amounts of funds to established infrastructure to utilise these slots.
“In perspective of this, however the allocation of slots to these airlines is non permanent the same simply cannot be withdrawn from them with out any authentic foundation.”, the affidavit claimed.
“However, as and when the Jet Airways applies for slots then the slots would be allocated between all the airlines with out any claim of historicity in favour of any airline about these slots and these allocation of slots would be as for each the Slot Allocation Pointers, 2013”, the affidavit claimed.
The issue will be listened to on Friday.
In their affidavit, the Kalrock – Jalan consortium, who are thriving resolution applicants of Jet Airways, claimed they have been underneath the effect that slots and website traffic legal rights held by Jet will revert to it. The affidavit more claimed that the resolution expert and the applicant frequently communicated with MoCA and DGCA to reclaim all the slots and the website traffic legal rights held by Jet and even with the truth that there was a moratorium, the authorities reallocated slots and website traffic legal rights to other airlines.
Also, they alleged that the authorities did not, at any place in time, advise the resolution expert that historic legal rights would not be readily available to the company debtor or that slots and website traffic legal rights allocated on adhoc foundation to other airlines would generate historic legal rights in favour these other airlines.
MoCA and DGCA, on the other hand, have claimed slots simply cannot be owned by any one entity. Slot allocation is performed by the respective airport operators, based upon the availability of all things — runway capacity, terminal capacity, parking stand capacity, and other connected infrastructure at an airport, such as air navigation companies — and as for each the extant guidelines for slot allocation. Appropriately, the company debtor or resolution applicant simply cannot claim the slots as a issue of right underneath the current insolvency proceedings.
Jet Airways shut down in April 2019, next a money crunch. The airline’s slots and website traffic legal rights have been then allocated to other airlines, enabling them to fill the capacity vacuum and start new companies.
More in their affidavit MoCA and DGCA have claimed, the resolution applicant are not able to claim historicity on the slots which have been allotted to them for winter 2018 and summer months 2019 period, as they failed to utilise 80 for each cent of the slots allotted to them and stopped their operation even ahead of the commencement of insolvency proceedings. Thus on the date of imposition of moratorium, neither they experienced any slots nor they experienced the right to claim historicity on the slots allotted to them in winter 2018 and summer months 2019 period.